The Navy’s push to retire seven guided-missile cruisers stems from management and planning in its original modernization program that caused exorbitant cost growth, according to service officials. Navy officials have repeatedly cited cost as a reason for the proposed decommissionings, arguing that the service could put the money toward other modernization priorities instead of sustaining the aging platforms. “The cruisers right now and the modernization are running 175 to 200 percent above estimated costs, hundreds of days delay. These ships were intended to have a 30-year service life, we’re out to 35,” Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday told
Crystal Cruises Acquires Historic SS United States
USS Anzio Archives - USNI News
Changing Surface Warfare Qualifications: Better Incentives Make Deadlier Officers
Does Sea of Stars Have Missable Content? Does Sea of Stars Have a
DISASTER AT SAVO ISLAND, 1942 - History Guild
Rep. Adam Smith Archives - USNI News
US Navy Reports on Collisions in Pacific – the USS Fitzgerald – The Diplomat
Ukrainian Navy Calls Destruction Of Russian Warship A 'Serious Blow' To War Effort
The Trial of Admiral Doenitz
USN Large Surface Combatant - Delayed, Page 5
MDC第二論壇- 中華民國海軍未來發展討論區20
13 Worst Cruise Lines By Injuries and Assaults - 2023 Picks
Planning a cruise in 2024? Here's your guide to avoiding common mistakes - Consumer Rescue