JCM, Free Full-Text

JCM, Free Full-Text

4.6
(143)
Write Review
More
$ 12.00
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

Background: Despite the use of robotics becoming increasingly popular among thoracic surgeons worldwide, there remains debate over the best robotic approach for lung resections. In this paper, we delineated the main port placement strategies and discussed their advantages and disadvantages. Methods: A PubMed literature review was performed using key phrases such as “robotic lobectomy technique”, “RATS lobectomy”, and “port placement robotic lobectomy”. After the final review, 22 articles were included as references, of which 10 described common robotic port mapping techniques. Results: Several port strategies for robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomies have been proposed and described in the literature, each showing its own limitations and advantages. Conclusions: New robotic surgeons may choose their port strategy according to personal preference and previous surgical experience, especially regarding open or VATS resections. Robust data comparing different port placements in robotic surgery are lacking. Further research should be directed toward comparisons of clinical outcomes with different robotic approaches.

JCM Free Full-Text Pathophysiology And Clinical Management, 56% OFF

JCM, Free Full-Text, buona spray sol nasal

JCM, Free Full-Text

JCM, Free Full-Text

JCM, Free Full-Text

JCM, Free Full-Text

JCM Free Full-Text Pathophysiology And Clinical Management, 56% OFF

JCM, Free Full-Text

Journal of Clinical Medicine An Open Access Journal from MDPI