Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: New Criteria to Predict

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

PDF) A Real World 10-Year Experience With Vascular Closure Devices

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

Perclose Proglide™ for vascular closure

Anna Turyan (@AnnaTuryan) / X

Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and AngioSeal for Hemostasis at the

Radcliffe Vascular - Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

Sebastian SADONI, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, München, LMU, Clinic of Cardiac Surgery